205
205
Italy, c. 2015
silver, glass 1½ d × 6½ dia in (4 × 17 cm)
silver, glass 1½ d × 6½ dia in (4 × 17 cm)
estimate: $10,000–15,000
result: $10,000
follow artist
provenance: Cipriani family | Collection of Susan Grant Lewin
I believe that there is a special energy in these materials….Even when my jewels aren’t being worn, when they are laid on your table, they are not dead. I think traditional jewelry—not art jewelry—when it is not worn, it is asleep.
Giorgio Vigna
Jewelry is one of the most graphic indicators of personal identity. In sync with the body, it helps to define the individuals who wear it. Jewelry is also among the most revealing examples of material culture. The necklaces, earrings, bracelets, rings, and brooches worn by people throughout the ages contain powerful clues about the eras, traditions, habitations, and societies in which they lived.
To this day, jewelry continues to act as an important signifier. The twentieth century, along with the first two decades of the twenty-first, is particularly rich in what we refer to as “studio jewelry.” Studio jewelry, which is invariably handmade, can simply celebrate process and provide an alternative to fine or costume jewelry, but it can also harbor deeper meanings—concepts far beyond jewelry’s usual function as decoration, commemoration, or talisman. Studio jewelry exists at the nexus of art, craft, and design, often reflecting aesthetic concerns, theoretical doctrines, political agendas, or popular trends. Most studio jewelry is either unique or produced in limited edition. It can be fabricated from precious metals and gemstones, or created from materials outside the norm, or both. Studio jewelry may be easy to wear, or present tactical challenges. All in all, it is a most compelling adornment—whether we regard it technically, stylistically, artistically, or even existentially.
Auction Results Giorgio Vigna